Content that gets quoted

The most reliable structure is a heading that asks the question, two or three sentences that answer it completely, then the detail for readers who want it. That opening block is what gets lifted.

It also happens to be better for readers. Nobody has ever complained that a page told them the answer too quickly.

A paragraph that depends on the one before it cannot be quoted without losing its meaning. Repeating the subject rather than leaning on 'it' or 'this' costs a few words and makes the passage portable.

The same applies to numbers. A figure with its unit and its period attached survives extraction; a bare number does not.

Vague marketing prose cannot be cited because there is nothing in it to quote. Numbers, dates, named sources, comparison tables and plain definitions all give an assistant something concrete.

This is why original data outperforms opinion so heavily here. An assistant answering a question needs a source, and a page with a real figure is a better source than a page with an adjective.

Freshness matters on a subject that moves quickly, and a visible last-updated date helps both readers and machines judge it.

Touching a timestamp without changing the content is a short-lived trick and a long-lived credibility problem. Update the substance or leave the date alone.